AI · SEMICONDUCTOR · FACT CHECK
SKD WIREPartly True
Redacting personal information from court rulings before public release takes an average of one month, a delay that is increasingly at odds with the rapid spread of AI tools capable of searching and processing public documents. The gap is emerging as a new barrier between the principle of open justice and the practical limits of manual review.
Under current practice, personal information in judgments must be masked before decisions are made public, and this process takes an average of one month to complete. The delay means rulings that are legally public records remain unavailable to citizens and researchers during that window.
The redaction requirement exists to protect privacy, but its pace has become a point of friction as demand for access to judicial data grows.
AI-based tools are now eroding what the report describes as a "disclosure barrier" (공개 장벽). Where manual redaction once functioned as a de facto gate on how quickly judgments reached the public, AI systems can process and search large volumes of text in a fraction of the time required for human review.
This shift raises a tension: the same technology that speeds up access also heightens privacy concerns, since automated processing of judgments could expose personal data if redaction lags behind release.
The exact scope of AI adoption by courts and the reliability of automated redaction remain unconfirmed.
The claim that redaction takes an average of one month while AI is dismantling the public disclosure barrier is Partly True.