AI · SEMICONDUCTOR · FACT CHECK
SKD WIREMostly True
A second case has emerged of an applicant wearing AI glasses during the University of Seoul's early admissions (susi) examination, bringing the total number of identified candidates to two. Unlike the first candidate, who reportedly wore the device, the additional applicant had the glasses placed on the desk during the test. Authorities have not confirmed whether the device was actually used to gain an unfair advantage.
The additional candidate was identified during the review of the same examination session, according to the facts established so far. The glasses were reportedly resting on the desk rather than being worn, which may affect how the case is assessed under rules governing electronic devices in the testing hall.
It remains unconfirmed whether either applicant activated or benefited from the AI glasses' functions during the exam. The university has not disclosed details on disciplinary measures, and no determination of cheating has been announced for the candidate whose glasses were placed on the desk.
The distinction matters because test regulations typically treat possession of a prohibited device and its active use differently. Further clarification from the university or examination authorities has not yet been provided.
The claim that an additional University of Seoul early-admissions candidate had AI glasses on the desk is accurate in its core facts, though questions about actual use remain open, making the assessment Mostly True.
