Cost savings clash with weak returns

The headline numbers capture a widening gap between cost efficiency and commercial viability. While the 90% reduction in production costs represents a dramatic drop in the barrier to creating content, the share of works that actually became profitable stands at just 1.3%, underscoring that cheaper production has not translated into earnings for most creators.

The figures were assessed against a set of primary sources, though the underlying reasons for the low profitability rate — whether oversupply of content, weak monetization channels, or audience resistance — were not established in the reviewed material.

Mostly accurate, with caveats

The core claim holds: the 90% cost reduction and the 1.3% profitability figure are consistent with the source material. What remains less clear is the full context, including the size of the sample and the time period over which profitability was measured. Readers should treat the profitability figure as indicative of a broader trend rather than a definitive market statistic.

The claim that production costs fell 90% while only 1.3% of works became profitable is Mostly True.