A Growth Curve Built on a Small Base

The 873% figure is accurate as stated, but its scale is a function of arithmetic as much as momentum. The company is expanding from a small revenue starting point, which makes explosive percentage growth mathematically attainable in a way it is not for established players. Samsung Electronics and SK hynix, whose memory businesses generate revenue on an entirely different order of magnitude, would be structurally incapable of matching such a rate even in a record year. In other words, the surge signals rapid scaling by a late entrant rather than a shift in market leadership.

Unaudited Numbers and an Open Technology Gap

The revenue figures behind the claim have not been independently audited, leaving room for later revision and warranting caution in direct comparisons with the audited disclosures of the Korean majors. The operational gap is equally material: the Chinese firm continues to trail its Korean rivals in process technology, and it has yet to field HBM — the stacked high-bandwidth memory at the center of AI infrastructure demand and the product category where SK hynix in particular has built its current advantage. Chasing Samsung Electronics and SK hynix on revenue growth is one thing; competing with them in the highest-value segment of the market is another.

Verdict

The claim that the Chinese semiconductor company's revenue surged 873% is True, provided it is reported with the accompanying context of the low-base effect, the lack of an independent audit, the remaining technology gap, and the company's absence from HBM.