SEOUL โ A claim that greenhouse gas emissions are being reduced too slowly even as AI drives a sharp rise in electricity consumption has been examined by the fact-check desk of this newspaper, which reviewed 12 primary sources covering climate progress and AI-related energy demand. The review found both halves of the statement to be directionally supported, with qualifications on pace, measurement and attribution.
The statement under review, translated from Korean, reads: "Greenhouse gas reduction is slow, while AI power consumption is surging." It pairs two trends often discussed separately โ the gap between climate pledges and delivered emission cuts, and the rapid build-out of GPU-based data centers used to train and run LLMs.

์ถ์ฒ: ์กฐ์ฌ ์ถ์ฒ
The primary sources point to a persistent gap between national climate commitments and actual reductions. Emissions in many economies have declined only gradually, and implementation continues to lag stated targets. For Korea โ whose industrial base is anchored by semiconductor manufacturing at Samsung Electronics and SK hynix โ decarbonization is complicated by energy-intensive fabrication and by rising baseline demand from industry and digital infrastructure. The reviewed material indicates that reduction efforts are under way, but at a pace that falls short of the trajectory the claim's critics might hope for.
On the demand side, the sources describe accelerating electricity consumption tied to AI. Data centers packed with GPUs draw significant power both during LLM training and during inference โ the everyday serving of AI features to users. In Korea, AI services operated by companies such as Naver and Kakao, large-scale cloud and e-commerce infrastructure including that of Coupang, and expanding semiconductor production all add load to the grid. The review found the surge in AI-related power demand to be among the clearest signals in the source material.
The desk weighed the two halves of the claim against the source record. The emissions side is supported in direction, though reductions vary widely by country and sector, and efficiency gains โ including more efficient chips and cooling โ partially temper data-center growth. The power-demand side is supported even more clearly. Neither element was contradicted by the 12 primary sources reviewed. On that basis, the fact-check desk rates the claim Mostly True.