The claim in context

The claim centers on a perceived contradiction: AI developers that had advocated caution and slower AI development have proceeded to launch new models. The assessment, which examined 12 primary sources, found the claim broadly accurate, with the caveat noted in its verdict term.

What was assessed

The final judgment was rendered as "mostly true," indicating that the core of the claim — that AI companies which had urged a slowdown have since released new AI models in succession — holds against the primary sources reviewed. Details beyond this, including the specific timing and naming of each model release, were not specified in the assessment materials available.

Caveats

The review materials did not include company statements, release dates, or model specifics, so the precise scope of each launch remains outside what the assessment documents. Readers should treat the finding as applying to the general pattern described rather than to individual model details.

The claim that AI companies which called for a slower pace of development have rolled out new AI models one after another was judged Mostly True.